Do you think that Ukraine should be allowed to strike Russian territory with F16s?

The debate on whether Ukraine should be allowed to strike Russian territory with F16s

The recent approval of European allies providing American-made F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine has sparked a heated debate on whether Ukraine should be allowed to strike Russian territory with these jets. Those in favor of Ukraine's right to strike argue that it is necessary for Ukraine to defend itself against Russian aggression. With Russian missiles and artillery regularly targeting Ukrainian civilians and infrastructure, Ukraine requires modern jets to strengthen its air and missile defenses, save lives, and protect civilians. Furthermore, retired generals have suggested that cross-border raids in Russia could be effective in deterring further Russian aggression .

On the other hand, those against Ukraine's right to strike argue that it could escalate the conflict and lead to further loss of life. Senior Russian diplomats have warned that the transfer of F-16 jets to Ukraine would raise the question of NATO's role in the conflict and could provoke a military response from Russia . Additionally, some experts have suggested that Russian forces could easily impede Ukrainian F-16s from flying by targeting a few key airfields.

Ultimately, the decision on whether Ukraine should be allowed to strike Russian territory with F-16s is a complex and contentious issue. It is important to consider the potential consequences and weigh the benefits against the risks. What do you think about this topic? Take part in the survey “Do you think that Ukraine should be allowed to strike Russian territory with F16s?“ on our website en.referendum.social and also write your opinion in the comments.