Do you agree that Supreme Court is political and always has been?

The political nature of the Supreme Court throughout history

Throughout history, the Supreme Court has been acknowledged as a political institution, influenced by the appointment process and political considerations. The process of selecting and confirming judicial nominees has always involved politics. The appointment of justices is a highly political process, with presidents nominating individuals who align with their political ideologies and values. This political influence extends to the confirmation process, where nominees are scrutinized and evaluated based on their political leanings.

The ideological divisions within the Supreme Court and the partisan decision-making further highlight its political nature. The Court has long been divided into two ideological camps, with justices often voting along party lines. This partisan decision-making has led to concerns about the Court's impartiality and its ability to make decisions based solely on the interpretation of the law. Public faith in the institution has declined, with a growing perception that the Court is deciding cases based on politics rather than the law.

The topic of whether the Supreme Court is political and has always been is a contentious one. It is important to gather public opinions and perspectives on this matter. We invite you to participate in the survey "Do you agree that Supreme Court is political and always has been?" on our website en.referendum.social. Your opinion and insights are valuable in understanding the public's perception of the Supreme Court's political nature. Let your voice be heard and contribute to the ongoing discussion on this important topic.