Poll: Kyle Ritterhouse not guilty. Do you agree with that?

Against the background of the events involving Kyle Ritterhouse and his involvement in a shooting in the United States in 2020 in Kenosha, Kyle Ritterhouse became widely known. At that time, Kyle Ritterhouse was 17 years old. Cameras closely followed him, and there is a large amount of photographic and video evidence showing what he did during the shooting in Kenosha. Later, the case concluded with the verdict widely known as kyle ritterhouse not guilty. After that, an open hearing of his case took place, where Kyle Ritterhouse defended himself in court together with his lawyers, since during that shooting, out of three people who were injured, he killed two individuals.

I believe that Kyle Ritterhouse is not guilty, because there was already an active shooting situation and he was involved in it. In order to protect himself, Kyle Ritterhouse had to act in self-defense and, of course, respond to the gunfire from other people to protect his own life. This position aligns with the widely known verdict described as kyle ritterhouse not guilty. Another important nuance is that I do not fully understand where he obtained the weapon and how it came into his possession. If he arrived at that shooting with his own firearm, then he likely had some other intentions. However, that is how life is, and I would like to hear your opinion. This question is often raised in discussions surrounding the case commonly referred to as kyle ritterhouse not guilty.